Income and Wealth Inequality
Leaders: Nicholas Bloom, Raj Chetty, Emmanuel Saez
The CPI is home to some of the country’s most influential analyses of the income and wealth distribution. The purpose of the Income and Wealth RG is to monitor the ongoing takeoff in income inequality, to better understand its sources, and to analyze its implications for labor market performance, educational attainment, mobility, and more. The following is a sampling of the CPI’s research projects within this area.
Trends in income and wealth inequality: What are the key trends in U.S. income and wealth inequality? The U.S. increasingly looks to Emmanuel Saez and his research team for the latest data on U.S. economic inequality.
Distributional National Accounts: In an ambitious infrastructural project, Emmanuel Saez and his team are building a “Distributional National Accounts” based on tax returns, a data set that will eliminate the current gap between (a) national accounts data based on economic aggregates and (b) inequality analysis that uses micro-level tax data to examine the distribution of income but is not consistent with national aggregates. This new data set will in turn make it possible to evaluate the extent to which economic growth, which has long been represented as a preferred poverty-reduction approach, is indeed delivering on that objective.
The rise of between-firm inequality: How much of the rise in earnings inequality can be attributed to increasing between-firm dispersion in the average wages they pay? This question can be addressed by constructing a matched employer-employee data set for the United States using administrative records.
Rent and inequality: It is increasingly fashionable to argue that “rent” accounts for much of the takeoff in income inequality. The Current Population Survey can be used to assess whether this claim is on the mark.
Featured Examples
Income And Wealth - CPI Research
Title | Author | Media | |
---|---|---|---|
Egalitarian Societies | Woodburn, James. | ||
Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess | Robert H Frank |
Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of ExcessAuthor: Robert H FrankPublisher: Simon and Schuster Date: |
|
The Evolution of Retirement: An American Economic History, 1880-1990 | Dora L. Costa |
The Evolution of Retirement: An American Economic History, 1880-1990Author: Dora L. CostaPublisher: University of Chicago Press Date: |
|
Classes in Capitalism and Pre-Capitalism | Karl Marx | ||
The Division of Labor in Society | Durkheim, Emile |
- ‹ previous
- 18 of 31
- next ›
income and wealth - CPI Affiliates
![]() |
John Roemer |
Elizabeth S. and A. Varick Professor of Political Sciences and Economics; Fellow, Econometric Society |
Yale University |
![]() |
Thomas A. DiPrete |
Giddings Professor of Sociology; Co-Director, Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy |
Columbia University |
![]() |
John Van Reenen |
Professor of Applied Economics |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
![]() |
Tim Biblarz |
Associate Professor of Sociology and Gender Studies |
University of Southern California |
![]() |
Jonas Pontusson |
Professor of Comparative Politics |
University of Geneva |
Pages
Income And Wealth - Other Research
Title | Author | Media | |
---|---|---|---|
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors | Lawrence F. Katz and Murphy Katz |
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand FactorsAuthor: Lawrence F. Katz and Murphy KatzPublisher: Quarterly Journal of Economics Date: |
|
The Social Stratification of Theatre, Dance, and Cinema Attendance | Tak Wing Chan and John H. Goldthorpe |
The Social Stratification of Theatre, Dance, and Cinema AttendanceAuthor: Tak Wing Chan and John H. GoldthorpePublisher: Routledge Date: In current sociological literature the relationship between social inequality and patterns of cultural taste and consumption is the subject of a large and complex debate. In this paper the primary aim is to examine, in the light of empirical results from a research project in which the authors are presently engaged, three main, and rival, positions that have been taken up in this debate, here labelled as the ‘homology', the ‘individualization' and the ‘omnivore–univore' arguments. Elsewhere, we have concentrated on musical consumption in England, and find evidence that is broadly supportive of the omnivore–univore argument. Here we ask whether such findings are confirmed in the case of theatre, dance and cinema attendance. A secondary aim of the paper is to bring to the attention of practitioners in the field of cultural policy and administration the need to address the issues that arise through the use of more powerful methods of data analysis than those often applied in the past. We explain how indicators of theatre, dance and cinema attendance derived from the Arts in England survey of 2001 can be subject to analysis so as to reveal two distinctive patterns of attendance and, in turn, two distinctive types of consumer—who can, it turns out, be regarded as omnivores and univores, even if with some qualification. The former have relatively high rates of attendance at all kinds of the events covered, including musicals and pantomimes as well as plays and ballet, while the latter tend to be cinema-goers only, that is, non-consumers of theatre and dance. A range of measures of social inequality are then introduced into the authors' analyses, including separate measures of social class and social status and also of educational level and income, and it is further shown that, again in conformity with the omnivore–univore argument, these two types of consumer are socially stratified. Omnivores are of generally higher social status than univores and also have usually higher levels of education and higher income than do univores (the latter finding marking the main difference with musical consumption, which was unaffected by income once other stratification variables were controlled). In sum, our results for theatre, dance and cinema attendance lend, overall, further support to the omnivore–univore argument as against its rivals, but also indicate that different aspects of social inequality impact on different forms of cultural consumption in varying degrees and probably through largely separate processes. |
|
What Do Unions Do | Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff | ||
Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique | Frank Parkin |
Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois CritiqueAuthor: Frank ParkinPublisher: Columbia University Press Date: *** |
|
Bad jobs in America : Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States | Arne L. Kalleberg, Barbara F. Reskin and Ken... |
Bad jobs in America : Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United StatesAuthor: Arne L. Kalleberg, Barbara F. Reskin and Ken...Publisher: American Sociological Review Date: |
- ‹ previous
- 18 of 28
- next ›
Income And Wealth - Multimedia
Sorry, but no media items exist for this research group.
- ‹ previous
- 6 of 6