The Poverty and Inequality Report provides a unified assessment of how the United States is faring in its efforts to reduce poverty and inequality and equalize opportunity.
Table of Contents (Special Issue 2015)
STATE OF THE STATES: THE POVERTY AND INEQUALITY REPORT 2015
States have developed their own constellation of institutions and practices that may in turn result in very different poverty and inequality profiles. But exactly how much difference is observed? Is the United States indeed running 50 very different poverty and inequality regimes? Have any states been able to stem the poverty-increasing effects of the Great Recession? Have any states been able to reverse the country’s spectacular takeoff in income inequality?
The Great Recession spread to every state, though employment fell more in some states than in others. The ongoing increases in the total number of jobs and ongoing declines in the official unemployment rate disguise a very slow recovery in prime-age (25-54) employment.
The recovery has not translated into a bona fide reduction in poverty (relative to the pre-recession baseline) in any state. In only six states have poverty rates returned to their pre-recession levels. Although blacks and Hispanics face higher risks of poverty in most every state, there is also much state-level variability in the extent of this disadvantage.
There is also increasing cross-state dispersion in the amount of income inequality, with states like California and New York experiencing a 19-percentage-point growth in the share of income held by the top 10%, while states like Delaware and West Virginia experienced only a 9-percentage-point growth.
There is extreme racial segregation within each of the states; in fact states are, on average, more racially segregated than are cities and metropolitan areas. However, states differ, often dramatically, in the extent to which they are racially or ethnically segregated. For example, 85 percent of blacks in Montana would have to move to a new neighborhood to effect complete integration, whereas only 56 percent of blacks in Nevada would have to do so.
In non-recessionary periods, the safety net provides about 38 percent of the income support needed to raise incomes up to the official poverty line. Only four states (Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Washington) provide more than 60 percent of the support needed.
The size of a state’s racial achievement gaps is strongly related to the extent of racial socioeconomic disparities in the state’s population. States where racial differences in income, educational attainment, poverty, and unemployment are large tend to have the largest racial achievement gaps. Nonetheless, socioeconomic disparities do not fully account for achievement gaps. Unequal access to quality schools likely contributes to the gaps as well.
There is substantial variation across the states in health care access, health behaviors, and self-rated health status. In some southern states, as many as one in five adults report foregoing care even when they need it, a rate twice as high as prevails in many other states.
There is substantial variation within the United States in the prospects for escaping poverty. In the highest-mobility areas of the United States, mobility rates are higher than rates in most other developed countries, and more than 1 in 10 children with parents in the bottom quintile of the income distribution reach the top quintile by adulthood. In the lowest-mobility areas of the United States, which tend to be in the South, fewer than 1 in 20 poor children reach the top quintile, a rate that is lower than in any developed country for which data have been analyzed to date.